Review



fibroblast growth factor  (R&D Systems)


Bioz Verified Symbol R&D Systems is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol R&D Systems manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 93

    Structured Review

    R&D Systems fibroblast growth factor
    Retention of endogenous growth factors in the Thyroid Acellular Scaffold (TAS). The bar chart shows the concentrations (pg/mL) of key growth factors—Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF), Transforming Growth Factor-β (TGF-β), Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF), <t>Fibroblast</t> Growth Factor (FGF), Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF), and Platelet-Derived Growth Factor (PDGF)—in native thyroid tissue and the TAS, as quantified by ELISA. Although the decellularization process resulted in a significant reduction in the concentration of all measured growth factors, the TAS successfully retained a substantial amount of these bioactive molecules. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. **p < 0.01 compared to native tissue.
    Fibroblast Growth Factor, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 42 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rat+fgf2+elisa+kit/Mouse%2FRat+FGF+basic%2FFGF2%2FbFGF+Quantikine+ELISA+Kit/pmc12647052-99-32-36
    Average 93 stars, based on 42 article reviews
    fibroblast growth factor - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    93/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Development of a biomimetic thyroid acellular scaffold as a 3D platform for modeling thyroid cancer aggressiveness and drug resistance"

    Article Title: Development of a biomimetic thyroid acellular scaffold as a 3D platform for modeling thyroid cancer aggressiveness and drug resistance

    Journal: Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology

    doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1692549

    Retention of endogenous growth factors in the Thyroid Acellular Scaffold (TAS). The bar chart shows the concentrations (pg/mL) of key growth factors—Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF), Transforming Growth Factor-β (TGF-β), Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF), Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF), Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF), and Platelet-Derived Growth Factor (PDGF)—in native thyroid tissue and the TAS, as quantified by ELISA. Although the decellularization process resulted in a significant reduction in the concentration of all measured growth factors, the TAS successfully retained a substantial amount of these bioactive molecules. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. **p < 0.01 compared to native tissue.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Retention of endogenous growth factors in the Thyroid Acellular Scaffold (TAS). The bar chart shows the concentrations (pg/mL) of key growth factors—Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF), Transforming Growth Factor-β (TGF-β), Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF), Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF), Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF), and Platelet-Derived Growth Factor (PDGF)—in native thyroid tissue and the TAS, as quantified by ELISA. Although the decellularization process resulted in a significant reduction in the concentration of all measured growth factors, the TAS successfully retained a substantial amount of these bioactive molecules. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. **p < 0.01 compared to native tissue.

    Techniques Used: Derivative Assay, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Concentration Assay, Standard Deviation

    Related Articles

    Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay:

    Article Title: FGF2/HGF priming facilitates adipose-derived stem cell-mediated bone formation in osteoporotic defects
    Article Snippet: The osteocalcin antibody was obtained from Bioss (Woburn, MA, USA). .. Rat HGF ELISA Kit, Rat FGF2 ELISA Kit and recombinant FGF2 protein were obtained from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN, USA). .. Rat HGF ELISA Kit, Rat FGF2 ELISA Kit and recombinant FGF2 protein were obtained from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN, USA).

    Article Title: Fibroblast deletion of ROCK2 attenuates cardiac hypertrophy, fibrosis, and diastolic dysfunction
    Article Snippet: .. FGF2 protein in this NaCl wash buffer was quantitated using rat FGF2 ELISA kit according to manufacturer’s instructions (MFB00; R&D Systems). .. In addition, the mixture of both supernatant and subsequent NaCl wash buffer was filtered and concentrated 100-fold using a 10 kDa cut-off filter (Amicon Ultra-10; Millipore).

    Recombinant:

    Article Title: FGF2/HGF priming facilitates adipose-derived stem cell-mediated bone formation in osteoporotic defects
    Article Snippet: The osteocalcin antibody was obtained from Bioss (Woburn, MA, USA). .. Rat HGF ELISA Kit, Rat FGF2 ELISA Kit and recombinant FGF2 protein were obtained from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN, USA). .. Rat HGF ELISA Kit, Rat FGF2 ELISA Kit and recombinant FGF2 protein were obtained from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN, USA).



    Similar Products

    94
    Bio-Techne corporation mouse/rat fgf basic/fgf2/bfgf quantikine elisa kit
    Mouse/Rat Fgf Basic/Fgf2/Bfgf Quantikine Elisa Kit, supplied by Bio-Techne corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rat+fgf2+elisa+kit/Mouse%2FRat+FGF+basic%2FFGF2%2FbFGF+Quantikine+ELISA+Kit/custom%40mfb00%4040652632
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse/rat fgf basic/fgf2/bfgf quantikine elisa kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    R&D Systems fibroblast growth factor
    Retention of endogenous growth factors in the Thyroid Acellular Scaffold (TAS). The bar chart shows the concentrations (pg/mL) of key growth factors—Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF), Transforming Growth Factor-β (TGF-β), Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF), <t>Fibroblast</t> Growth Factor (FGF), Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF), and Platelet-Derived Growth Factor (PDGF)—in native thyroid tissue and the TAS, as quantified by ELISA. Although the decellularization process resulted in a significant reduction in the concentration of all measured growth factors, the TAS successfully retained a substantial amount of these bioactive molecules. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. **p < 0.01 compared to native tissue.
    Fibroblast Growth Factor, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rat+fgf2+elisa+kit/Mouse%2FRat+FGF+basic%2FFGF2%2FbFGF+Quantikine+ELISA+Kit/pmc12647052-99-32-36
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    fibroblast growth factor - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    R&D Systems fgf2
    In vitro cell viability and gene/protein evaluation of photothermally upregulated hADSCs spheroids within the patch. a) Schematic illustrations of the formation and photothermal upregulation of hADSCs spheroids (D = 173 ± 14 µm; mean values ± s.d.; sample size = 90) within the patch under irradiation of the LED array (3 × 3, 630 nm). Inset schematics show the cross‐sectional view of hADSCs spheroids‐loaded patch along with the LED array inside the container filled with the culturing solution. b) Representative results of live (fluorescein diacetate (FDA); green) and dead (ethidium bromide (EB); red) assay of no treatment (NT), photothermal stimulation for 1 h (PT 1H), and 24 h (PT 24H) groups. Scale bar is 500 µm. c) Cell viability evaluated with flow cytometry double staining of Annexin V and 7‐Aminoactinomycin D (7‐AAD) (Sample size = 4). d) Comparison of gene expressions in NT, PT 1H, and PT 24H group evaluated by quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT‐PCR) (Sample size = 4, one‐way ANOVA, ** P< 0.01, *** P< 0.001 compared to NT, $ P < 0.05, $$ P < 0.01, and $$$ P < 0.001 compared to each group). Evaluated genes are associated with factors of heat shock protein (HSP), angiogenesis, proliferation, and anti‐inflammation. e–h) Amount of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF; e), keratinocyte growth factor (KGF; f), fibroblast growth factor <t>(FGF2;</t> g), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF; h) secreted from hADSCs spheroids in each group as evaluated by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay <t>(ELISA,</t> Sample size = 6, one‐way ANOVA).
    Fgf2, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rat+fgf2+elisa+kit/Mouse%2FRat+FGF+basic%2FFGF2%2FbFGF+Quantikine+ELISA+Kit/pmc12713014-276-22-23
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    fgf2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    R&D Systems elisa kitswith fgf
    In vitro cell viability and gene/protein evaluation of photothermally upregulated hADSCs spheroids within the patch. a) Schematic illustrations of the formation and photothermal upregulation of hADSCs spheroids (D = 173 ± 14 µm; mean values ± s.d.; sample size = 90) within the patch under irradiation of the LED array (3 × 3, 630 nm). Inset schematics show the cross‐sectional view of hADSCs spheroids‐loaded patch along with the LED array inside the container filled with the culturing solution. b) Representative results of live (fluorescein diacetate (FDA); green) and dead (ethidium bromide (EB); red) assay of no treatment (NT), photothermal stimulation for 1 h (PT 1H), and 24 h (PT 24H) groups. Scale bar is 500 µm. c) Cell viability evaluated with flow cytometry double staining of Annexin V and 7‐Aminoactinomycin D (7‐AAD) (Sample size = 4). d) Comparison of gene expressions in NT, PT 1H, and PT 24H group evaluated by quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT‐PCR) (Sample size = 4, one‐way ANOVA, ** P< 0.01, *** P< 0.001 compared to NT, $ P < 0.05, $$ P < 0.01, and $$$ P < 0.001 compared to each group). Evaluated genes are associated with factors of heat shock protein (HSP), angiogenesis, proliferation, and anti‐inflammation. e–h) Amount of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF; e), keratinocyte growth factor (KGF; f), fibroblast growth factor <t>(FGF2;</t> g), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF; h) secreted from hADSCs spheroids in each group as evaluated by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay <t>(ELISA,</t> Sample size = 6, one‐way ANOVA).
    Elisa Kitswith Fgf, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rat+fgf2+elisa+kit/Mouse%2FRat+FGF+basic%2FFGF2%2FbFGF+Quantikine+ELISA+Kit/pmc12408641-139-19-23
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    elisa kitswith fgf - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    R&D Systems mouse rat fgf basic fgf2 bfgf quantikine elisa kit
    In vitro cell viability and gene/protein evaluation of photothermally upregulated hADSCs spheroids within the patch. a) Schematic illustrations of the formation and photothermal upregulation of hADSCs spheroids (D = 173 ± 14 µm; mean values ± s.d.; sample size = 90) within the patch under irradiation of the LED array (3 × 3, 630 nm). Inset schematics show the cross‐sectional view of hADSCs spheroids‐loaded patch along with the LED array inside the container filled with the culturing solution. b) Representative results of live (fluorescein diacetate (FDA); green) and dead (ethidium bromide (EB); red) assay of no treatment (NT), photothermal stimulation for 1 h (PT 1H), and 24 h (PT 24H) groups. Scale bar is 500 µm. c) Cell viability evaluated with flow cytometry double staining of Annexin V and 7‐Aminoactinomycin D (7‐AAD) (Sample size = 4). d) Comparison of gene expressions in NT, PT 1H, and PT 24H group evaluated by quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT‐PCR) (Sample size = 4, one‐way ANOVA, ** P< 0.01, *** P< 0.001 compared to NT, $ P < 0.05, $$ P < 0.01, and $$$ P < 0.001 compared to each group). Evaluated genes are associated with factors of heat shock protein (HSP), angiogenesis, proliferation, and anti‐inflammation. e–h) Amount of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF; e), keratinocyte growth factor (KGF; f), fibroblast growth factor <t>(FGF2;</t> g), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF; h) secreted from hADSCs spheroids in each group as evaluated by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay <t>(ELISA,</t> Sample size = 6, one‐way ANOVA).
    Mouse Rat Fgf Basic Fgf2 Bfgf Quantikine Elisa Kit, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rat+fgf2+elisa+kit/Mouse%2FRat+FGF+basic%2FFGF2%2FbFGF+Quantikine+ELISA+Kit/bio_rxiv__2025__06__07__658373-177-7-13
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse rat fgf basic fgf2 bfgf quantikine elisa kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    R&D Systems rat fgf 2 elisa kit
    In vitro cell viability and gene/protein evaluation of photothermally upregulated hADSCs spheroids within the patch. a) Schematic illustrations of the formation and photothermal upregulation of hADSCs spheroids (D = 173 ± 14 µm; mean values ± s.d.; sample size = 90) within the patch under irradiation of the LED array (3 × 3, 630 nm). Inset schematics show the cross‐sectional view of hADSCs spheroids‐loaded patch along with the LED array inside the container filled with the culturing solution. b) Representative results of live (fluorescein diacetate (FDA); green) and dead (ethidium bromide (EB); red) assay of no treatment (NT), photothermal stimulation for 1 h (PT 1H), and 24 h (PT 24H) groups. Scale bar is 500 µm. c) Cell viability evaluated with flow cytometry double staining of Annexin V and 7‐Aminoactinomycin D (7‐AAD) (Sample size = 4). d) Comparison of gene expressions in NT, PT 1H, and PT 24H group evaluated by quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT‐PCR) (Sample size = 4, one‐way ANOVA, ** P< 0.01, *** P< 0.001 compared to NT, $ P < 0.05, $$ P < 0.01, and $$$ P < 0.001 compared to each group). Evaluated genes are associated with factors of heat shock protein (HSP), angiogenesis, proliferation, and anti‐inflammation. e–h) Amount of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF; e), keratinocyte growth factor (KGF; f), fibroblast growth factor <t>(FGF2;</t> g), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF; h) secreted from hADSCs spheroids in each group as evaluated by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay <t>(ELISA,</t> Sample size = 6, one‐way ANOVA).
    Rat Fgf 2 Elisa Kit, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rat+fgf2+elisa+kit/Mouse%2FRat+FGF+basic%2FFGF2%2FbFGF+Quantikine+ELISA+Kit/10__5812_slash_gct___160515-65-11-15
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rat fgf 2 elisa kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    R&D Systems fgf
    Structural, Mechanical, and Growth Factor Characterization of Thyroid Extracellular Matrix (TEM) Hydrogels. (A) SEM images of type I collagen hydrogel, 10 mg/mL TEM hydrogel, and 20 mg/mL TEM hydrogel. (B) Elastic modulus of native thyroid tissue, type I collagen hydrogel, 10 mg/mL TEM hydrogel, and 20 mg/mL TEM hydrogel. (C) Toughness of native thyroid tissue, type I collagen hydrogel, 10 mg/mL TEM hydrogel, and 20 mg/mL TEM hydrogel. (D) Concentrations of growth <t>factors</t> <t>(VEGF,</t> TGF-β, HGF, <t>FGF,</t> EGF, and PDGF) in native thyroid tissue, 10 mg/mL TEM hydrogel, and 20 mg/mL TEM hydrogel. All data represent means ± SD. (n = 6; ** p < .01 vs. native thyroid, and p < .01 vs. 10 mg/mL TEM hydrogel).
    Fgf, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rat+fgf2+elisa+kit/Mouse%2FRat+FGF+basic%2FFGF2%2FbFGF+Quantikine+ELISA+Kit/pmc11631613-164-25-26
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    fgf - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    R&D Systems mouse fgf2
    Structural, Mechanical, and Growth Factor Characterization of Thyroid Extracellular Matrix (TEM) Hydrogels. (A) SEM images of type I collagen hydrogel, 10 mg/mL TEM hydrogel, and 20 mg/mL TEM hydrogel. (B) Elastic modulus of native thyroid tissue, type I collagen hydrogel, 10 mg/mL TEM hydrogel, and 20 mg/mL TEM hydrogel. (C) Toughness of native thyroid tissue, type I collagen hydrogel, 10 mg/mL TEM hydrogel, and 20 mg/mL TEM hydrogel. (D) Concentrations of growth <t>factors</t> <t>(VEGF,</t> TGF-β, HGF, <t>FGF,</t> EGF, and PDGF) in native thyroid tissue, 10 mg/mL TEM hydrogel, and 20 mg/mL TEM hydrogel. All data represent means ± SD. (n = 6; ** p < .01 vs. native thyroid, and p < .01 vs. 10 mg/mL TEM hydrogel).
    Mouse Fgf2, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rat+fgf2+elisa+kit/Mouse%2FRat+FGF+basic%2FFGF2%2FbFGF+Quantikine+ELISA+Kit/pmc11297141__12276_2024_1274_MOESM1_ESM-8-4-7
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse fgf2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Retention of endogenous growth factors in the Thyroid Acellular Scaffold (TAS). The bar chart shows the concentrations (pg/mL) of key growth factors—Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF), Transforming Growth Factor-β (TGF-β), Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF), Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF), Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF), and Platelet-Derived Growth Factor (PDGF)—in native thyroid tissue and the TAS, as quantified by ELISA. Although the decellularization process resulted in a significant reduction in the concentration of all measured growth factors, the TAS successfully retained a substantial amount of these bioactive molecules. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. **p < 0.01 compared to native tissue.

    Journal: Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology

    Article Title: Development of a biomimetic thyroid acellular scaffold as a 3D platform for modeling thyroid cancer aggressiveness and drug resistance

    doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1692549

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Retention of endogenous growth factors in the Thyroid Acellular Scaffold (TAS). The bar chart shows the concentrations (pg/mL) of key growth factors—Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF), Transforming Growth Factor-β (TGF-β), Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF), Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF), Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF), and Platelet-Derived Growth Factor (PDGF)—in native thyroid tissue and the TAS, as quantified by ELISA. Although the decellularization process resulted in a significant reduction in the concentration of all measured growth factors, the TAS successfully retained a substantial amount of these bioactive molecules. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. **p < 0.01 compared to native tissue.

    Article Snippet: Specific ELISA kits were used to detect the content of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF, R&D Systems, RRV00), transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β, R&D Systems, RTB100B), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF, R&D Systems, MHG00), fibroblast growth factor (FGF, R&D Systems, MFB00), epidermal growth factor (EGF, R&D Systems, DY3214), and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF, R&D Systems, MBB00).

    Techniques: Derivative Assay, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Concentration Assay, Standard Deviation

    In vitro cell viability and gene/protein evaluation of photothermally upregulated hADSCs spheroids within the patch. a) Schematic illustrations of the formation and photothermal upregulation of hADSCs spheroids (D = 173 ± 14 µm; mean values ± s.d.; sample size = 90) within the patch under irradiation of the LED array (3 × 3, 630 nm). Inset schematics show the cross‐sectional view of hADSCs spheroids‐loaded patch along with the LED array inside the container filled with the culturing solution. b) Representative results of live (fluorescein diacetate (FDA); green) and dead (ethidium bromide (EB); red) assay of no treatment (NT), photothermal stimulation for 1 h (PT 1H), and 24 h (PT 24H) groups. Scale bar is 500 µm. c) Cell viability evaluated with flow cytometry double staining of Annexin V and 7‐Aminoactinomycin D (7‐AAD) (Sample size = 4). d) Comparison of gene expressions in NT, PT 1H, and PT 24H group evaluated by quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT‐PCR) (Sample size = 4, one‐way ANOVA, ** P< 0.01, *** P< 0.001 compared to NT, $ P < 0.05, $$ P < 0.01, and $$$ P < 0.001 compared to each group). Evaluated genes are associated with factors of heat shock protein (HSP), angiogenesis, proliferation, and anti‐inflammation. e–h) Amount of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF; e), keratinocyte growth factor (KGF; f), fibroblast growth factor (FGF2; g), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF; h) secreted from hADSCs spheroids in each group as evaluated by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA, Sample size = 6, one‐way ANOVA).

    Journal: Advanced Science

    Article Title: Gold Nanoturf‐Mediated Wireless Photothermal Upregulation of Human Adipose‐Derived Stem Cell Spheroids for Synergistic Skin‐Wound Closure

    doi: 10.1002/advs.202515490

    Figure Lengend Snippet: In vitro cell viability and gene/protein evaluation of photothermally upregulated hADSCs spheroids within the patch. a) Schematic illustrations of the formation and photothermal upregulation of hADSCs spheroids (D = 173 ± 14 µm; mean values ± s.d.; sample size = 90) within the patch under irradiation of the LED array (3 × 3, 630 nm). Inset schematics show the cross‐sectional view of hADSCs spheroids‐loaded patch along with the LED array inside the container filled with the culturing solution. b) Representative results of live (fluorescein diacetate (FDA); green) and dead (ethidium bromide (EB); red) assay of no treatment (NT), photothermal stimulation for 1 h (PT 1H), and 24 h (PT 24H) groups. Scale bar is 500 µm. c) Cell viability evaluated with flow cytometry double staining of Annexin V and 7‐Aminoactinomycin D (7‐AAD) (Sample size = 4). d) Comparison of gene expressions in NT, PT 1H, and PT 24H group evaluated by quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT‐PCR) (Sample size = 4, one‐way ANOVA, ** P< 0.01, *** P< 0.001 compared to NT, $ P < 0.05, $$ P < 0.01, and $$$ P < 0.001 compared to each group). Evaluated genes are associated with factors of heat shock protein (HSP), angiogenesis, proliferation, and anti‐inflammation. e–h) Amount of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF; e), keratinocyte growth factor (KGF; f), fibroblast growth factor (FGF2; g), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF; h) secreted from hADSCs spheroids in each group as evaluated by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA, Sample size = 6, one‐way ANOVA).

    Article Snippet: To analyze the secretion of paracrine factors in CM from each group, ELISA kits were used for human VEGF, HGF, KGF, and FGF2 (R&D Systems), according to the manufacturer's instructions.

    Techniques: In Vitro, Irradiation, Flow Cytometry, Double Staining, Comparison, Reverse Transcription, Quantitative RT-PCR, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay

    Structural, Mechanical, and Growth Factor Characterization of Thyroid Extracellular Matrix (TEM) Hydrogels. (A) SEM images of type I collagen hydrogel, 10 mg/mL TEM hydrogel, and 20 mg/mL TEM hydrogel. (B) Elastic modulus of native thyroid tissue, type I collagen hydrogel, 10 mg/mL TEM hydrogel, and 20 mg/mL TEM hydrogel. (C) Toughness of native thyroid tissue, type I collagen hydrogel, 10 mg/mL TEM hydrogel, and 20 mg/mL TEM hydrogel. (D) Concentrations of growth factors (VEGF, TGF-β, HGF, FGF, EGF, and PDGF) in native thyroid tissue, 10 mg/mL TEM hydrogel, and 20 mg/mL TEM hydrogel. All data represent means ± SD. (n = 6; ** p < .01 vs. native thyroid, and p < .01 vs. 10 mg/mL TEM hydrogel).

    Journal: Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology

    Article Title: Development and characterization of a novel injectable thyroid extracellular matrix hydrogel for enhanced thyroid tissue engineering applications

    doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1481295

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Structural, Mechanical, and Growth Factor Characterization of Thyroid Extracellular Matrix (TEM) Hydrogels. (A) SEM images of type I collagen hydrogel, 10 mg/mL TEM hydrogel, and 20 mg/mL TEM hydrogel. (B) Elastic modulus of native thyroid tissue, type I collagen hydrogel, 10 mg/mL TEM hydrogel, and 20 mg/mL TEM hydrogel. (C) Toughness of native thyroid tissue, type I collagen hydrogel, 10 mg/mL TEM hydrogel, and 20 mg/mL TEM hydrogel. (D) Concentrations of growth factors (VEGF, TGF-β, HGF, FGF, EGF, and PDGF) in native thyroid tissue, 10 mg/mL TEM hydrogel, and 20 mg/mL TEM hydrogel. All data represent means ± SD. (n = 6; ** p < .01 vs. native thyroid, and p < .01 vs. 10 mg/mL TEM hydrogel).

    Article Snippet: Specific ELISA kits were used to detect the content of growth factors, including VEGF (R&D Systems, RRV00), TGF-β (R&D Systems, RTB100B), HGF (R&D Systems, MHG00), FGF (R&D Systems, MFB00), EGF (R&D Systems, DY3214), and PDGF (R&D Systems, MBB00).

    Techniques: